arrow

BP40091 miR122 Value Story: When not to use an emerging safety biomarker

 1 minute read

The Issue:

A KOL recommended for an investigator to use miR122 to monitor for early DILI in an investigator sponsored trial; an approach with which the Safety Science Leader for the BP40091 team did not agree.

The Avenue:

SABER provided the then unpublished internal data generated by POC work with the Anti-CSF1R/PDL1 team demonstrating miR122is not a reliable safety biomarker.

The Solution:

Liver scientific sub-team provided the data to demonstrate that miR122 is not a reliable biomarker to be used as a safety biomarker to monitor for BP40091-related DILI.

Strategy: Scientific rationale not to use the KOL recommended safety biomarker.

Assay: Virtual lab worked with the SA investigative toxicology group to develop and validate the method to measure and normalize miRs.

Operations: Not required for BP40091 team.

Data Solution: Biostats supported normalization approach.

The Impact:

Team was able to convince the investigator in question to NOT require miR122 measurements in the investigator sponsored trial.

PSTC and TransBioLine consortia no longer pursue miR122 as a safety biomarker for regulatory qualification.

The Insights:

Promising safety biomarkers must demonstrate little intra- and inter-individual variation.

Despite promising external data on safety biomarkers, we must still pressure test consortia and industry perspectives.

arrow Back to top
Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami